OnlySOTA

Claude Fable 5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Claude Fable 5 Ling 3.1 Flash
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 49.6 No. 8 of 374 41.1 No. 22 of 374
Arena — Agent Overall 0.082 No. 8 of 49 —
HarnessTax — SWE-bench Lite SWE-bench Lite 97.8% No. 1 of 7 —
HarnessTax — Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 75.6% No. 3 of 7 —
Arena — Code Overall 1625 No. 19 of 109 —
Arena — Text Overall (style control) 1504 No. 3 of 306 —
Arena — Vision Overall (style control) 1309 No. 1 of 128 —

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer Anthropic InclusionAI
Weights closed closed
Released 2026-06-09—
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $20.00$0.45
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA SOTA

Claude Fable 5 →Ling 3.1 Flash → How the kill line is drawn →

Claude Fable 5 against the other SOTA models

Ling 3.1 Flash against the other SOTA models