OnlySOTA

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Claude Opus 5.5 Ling 3.1 Flash
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 57.6 No. 1 of 374 41.1 No. 22 of 374
Arena — Agent Overall 0.138 No. 2 of 49 —
Artificial Analysis Coding Agents Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index 0.660 No. 2 of 22 —
Arena — Code Overall 1815 No. 1 of 109 —
Arena — Text Overall (style control) 1504 No. 4 of 306 —

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer Anthropic InclusionAI
Weights closed closed
Released ——
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $8.00$0.45
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA SOTA

Claude Opus 5.5 →Ling 3.1 Flash → How the kill line is drawn →

Claude Opus 5.5 against the other SOTA models

Ling 3.1 Flash against the other SOTA models