OnlySOTA

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Ling 3.1 Flash Grok 4.7
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 41.1 No. 22 of 374 46.4 No. 12 of 374
Arena — Agent Overall — 0.040 No. 16 of 49
Artificial Analysis Coding Agents Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index — 0.563 No. 11 of 22
Arena — Code Overall — 1638 No. 16 of 109
Arena — Text Overall (style control) — 1442 No. 91 of 306

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer InclusionAI SpaceXAI
Weights closed closed
Released ——
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $0.45$3.00
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA SOTA

Ling 3.1 Flash →Grok 4.7 → How the kill line is drawn →

Ling 3.1 Flash against the other SOTA models

Grok 4.7 against the other SOTA models