OnlySOTA

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Claude Fable 5.1 Ling 3.1 Flash
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 53.4 No. 3 of 374 41.1 No. 22 of 374
Arena — Agent Overall 0.143 No. 1 of 49 —
Artificial Analysis Coding Agents Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index 0.622 No. 5 of 22 —
Arena — Code Overall 1749 No. 5 of 109 —
Arena — Text Overall (style control) 1501 No. 6 of 306 —
Arena — Vision Overall (style control) 1288 No. 15 of 128 —

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer Anthropic InclusionAI
Weights closed closed
Released ——
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $20.00$0.45
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA SOTA

Claude Fable 5.1 →Ling 3.1 Flash → How the kill line is drawn →

Claude Fable 5.1 against the other SOTA models

Ling 3.1 Flash against the other SOTA models