OnlySOTA

Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Claude Fable 5 MiMo V2.6 Flash
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 49.6 No. 8 of 372 37.9 No. 33 of 372
Arena — Agent Overall 0.082 No. 8 of 49 -0.006 No. 34 of 49
HarnessTax — SWE-bench Lite SWE-bench Lite 97.8% No. 1 of 7 —
HarnessTax — Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 75.6% No. 3 of 7 —
Arena — Code Overall 1625 No. 18 of 109 —
Arena — Text Overall (style control) 1504 No. 3 of 306 1452 No. 77 of 306
Arena — Vision Overall (style control) 1309 No. 1 of 128 1247 No. 53 of 128

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer Anthropic Xiaomi
Weights closed open
Released 2026-06-09—
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $20.00$0.18
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA Executioner

Claude Fable 5 against the other SOTA models

MiMo V2.6 Flash against the other SOTA models