Gemini 4 Carbon vs 
Muse Wonder
Both are currently SOTA. Each row is one board’s result, and the marked figure is the one that board ranks higher. Rows are not added together, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they differ, the difference is the finding.Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or the model’s place in the board’s own order where it publishes none. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.
| Board | Gemini 4 Carbon | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 60.0 No. 1 of 43 | 43.6 No. 11 of 43 |
| Arena — Agent Overall | 0.166 No. 2 of 57 | 0.025 No. 18 of 57 |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Agents Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index | 0.594 No. 4 of 27 | 0.520 No. 13 of 27 |
| Arena — Code Overall | 1768 No. 4 of 152 | 1652 No. 20 of 152 |
| Arena — Text Overall (style control) | 1528 No. 1 of 419 | 1507 No. 4 of 419 |
At a glance
| Developer | Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Weights | closed | closed |
| Released | — | — |
| Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) | $8.00 | $8.00 |
| Value: where it sits on the kill line | SOTA | SOTA |
Gemini 4 Carbon →Muse Wonder → How the kill line is drawn →