Claude Fable 5 vs 
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Both are currently SOTA. Each row is one board’s result, and the marked figure is the one that board ranks higher. Rows are not added together, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they differ, the difference is the finding.Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or the model’s place in the board’s own order where it publishes none. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.
| Board | Claude Fable 5 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | — | 46.5 No. 10 of 43 |
| Arena — Agent Overall | 0.078 No. 10 of 57 | 0.047 No. 13 of 57 |
| Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 87.0% No. 10 of 85 | — |
| HarnessTax — SWE-bench Lite SWE-bench Lite | 97.8% No. 1 of 7 | — |
| HarnessTax — Terminal-Bench 2.0 Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 75.6% No. 3 of 7 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 44.5% No. 18 of 35 | — |
| Arena — Code Overall | 1624 No. 26 of 152 | 1695 No. 9 of 152 |
| Arena — Text Overall (style control) | 1504 No. 6 of 419 | — |
| Arena — Vision Overall (style control) | 1309 No. 1 of 167 | — |
At a glance
| Developer | Anthropic | Kimi |
|---|---|---|
| Weights | closed | closed |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | — |
| Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) | — | $4.00 |
| Value: where it sits on the kill line | — | SOTA |
Claude Fable 5 →Kimi K3.1 Pro → How the kill line is drawn →