OnlySOTA

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

Both are SOTA right now. Each row below is one board’s call on the two, and the marked figure is the one that board places higher. No row is added to another, so there is no overall winner: the boards measure different things, and where they split, that is the finding.

Board Muse Spark 1.3 MiMo V2.6 Pro
Artificial Analysis LLM Leaderboard Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index 48.1 No. 9 of 372 46.3 No. 13 of 372
Arena — Agent Overall 0.040 No. 18 of 49 0.033 No. 21 of 49
Artificial Analysis Coding Agents Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index 0.543 No. 13 of 22 —
Arena — Code Overall 1657 No. 14 of 109 1618 No. 24 of 109
Arena — Text Overall (style control) 1494 No. 9 of 306 1480 No. 26 of 306
Arena — Vision Overall (style control) 1290 No. 12 of 128 1245 No. 55 of 128

Each rank is the board’s own: the rank it publishes, or its place in its own order where it publishes none. The bar is how much of that board the model is ahead of. Scores from different boards cannot be compared.

At a glance

Developer Meta Xiaomi
Weights closed open
Released ——
Price Blended Price, USD per 1M tokens (3:1 input:output) $2.00$0.54
Value: where it sits on the kill line SOTA SOTA

Muse Spark 1.3 →MiMo V2.6 Pro → How the kill line is drawn →

Muse Spark 1.3 against the other SOTA models

MiMo V2.6 Pro against the other SOTA models